24-CASE TRACKING

Can children safely remain with their families?

All 24 entries use one continuous format: case explanation, antecedents/signals/consequences, chronology, post-case change, unresolved gaps and sources.

01|Kaikai case — Taiwan

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

02|Xuān-Xuān case — Taiwan

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

03|Ten-year-old placement dispute — Taiwan

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

04|Nantou Wu child case — Taiwan

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

05|Korean adoption and placement oversight

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

06|Family-support policy comparison

A documented event examined through protection, continuity of care and accountability.

Case explanation

This entry preserves the established case scope and distinguishes documented facts from questions still requiring official confirmation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

07|Nanjing Jiangning two-girls case — Mainland

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

08|Guardianship-removal cases — Mainland

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

09|HKSPC residential-home incident — Hong Kong

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

10|Mandatory-reporting implementation — Hong Kong

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

11|Meguro Yua case — Japan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

12|Noda Kokoro case — Japan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

13|Japan national fatality-review cases

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

14|Jeong-in case — South Korea

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

15|Overseas-adoption truth inquiry — South Korea

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

16|Public adoption transition — South Korea

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

17|De facto unsupported children — Mainland

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

18|Migrant-children separation cases — Mainland

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

19|Childcare mistreatment cases — Mainland

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

20|New Taipei childcare-centre case — Taiwan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

21|Cross-county transfer cases — Taiwan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

22|Kinship-care and placement disputes — Taiwan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

23|High-risk-family follow-up cases — Taiwan

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.

24|Preventive family-support benchmark

A source-bounded comparative case examined through the same safeguards.

Case explanation

This entry is included because published records, formal review or policy evidence identifies a child-protection risk relevant to family preservation.

Antecedents, signals and consequences

The analysis asks whether risk signals were connected across care, health, education, family and public authorities before the event or dispute became irreversible.

Post-case institutional change

Any stated reform is treated as a change to be verified through actual visits, service starts, supervision and outcomes—not as proof that implementation is complete.

What remains unresolved

Who saw the child, when responsibility transferred, what support was actually available, and whether the child’s stability was followed over time.

  1. Care, guardianship or service pressure accumulated.
  2. A safety concern, report, transfer or review point emerged.
  3. Judicial, administrative or institutional action followed.
  4. Implementation and child-safety outcomes remain to be verified.

See the Traditional Chinese edition for the linked primary sources and evidence boundary for this entry.